SURETY LIABILITY IS COEXTENSIVE WITH ITS BOND PRINCIPAL

A recent Miller act payment bond case, U.S. f/u/b/o Whitetail General Constructors v. Northcon, Inc., 2026 WL 46671 (D.Mont. 2026), contains a short noteworthy discussion as to a surety’s liability being coextensive with that of its bond principal. If you are bonded, or you are pursuing a bond, you need to appreciate this, which is why this is a noteworthy discussion:

A “surety’s liability on a Miller Act bond must be at least coextensive with the obligations imposed by the Act if the bond is to have its intended effect.” “Therefore, ‘the liability of a surety and its principal on a Miller Act payment bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of the principal only to the extent that it is consistent with the rights and obligations created under the Miller Act.’” In other words, “[w]here a subcontract’s terms are consistent with the Miller Act’s provisions, the surety’s liability on the Miller Act bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of its princip[al].” 

“[T]he measure of recovery under the Miller Act is generally determined by the terms of the subcontract [or underlying contract].”

Northcon, supra, at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).

Think about this. When you are suing a surety, it’s not uncommon that the surety tenders the defense back to the bond principal because the surety’s liability is coextensive with its bond principal. Even if the surety does not tender the defense, arguments under the underlying contract are going to be raised by the surety, as well as other arguments that are personal to the surety’s rights relative to the bond. This does not mean the that you can contract around statutory bond rights (such as the Miller Act) as a form of a “gotcha” type of contractual provision. You typically cannot. Otherwise, statutory bonds such as Miller Act bonds would not have their intended effect, and bond statutes would not have their intended effect.

If you are dealing with or defending against a bond claim, pleasure make sure you are working with construction counsel that understands the dynamics and relationship between the surety and the surety’s bond-principal.

Please contact David Adelstein at dadelstein@gmail.com or (954) 361-4720 if you have questions or would like more information regarding this article. You can follow David Adelstein on Twitter @DavidAdelstein1.

Posted in Miller Act and tagged , , .