
Let me
Represent YOUR
Construction
Interests!
Analyzing legal issues that
impact parties across the
construction industry.
Recent Posts
INTERACTION BETWEEN CGL INSURANCE, OCIP, AND SUBCONTRACTOR DEFAULT INSURANCE
Posted on 14 November, 2015
Here is a great opinion and insurance coverage dispute about the interaction between a CGL policy, and particularly one provided under an Owner’s Controlled Insurance Program, and a
THE DEFENSE OF BETTERMENT IN CONSTRUCTION DEFECT DISPUTES
Posted on 7 November, 2015
CONDITIONAL PAYMENT BONDS AND TRANSFERRING A LIEN TO THAT BOND
Posted on 31 October, 2015
There are two types of statutory payment bonds that can be furnished on private construction projects in Florida: (1) unconditional payment bonds issued pursuant to Florida Statute s. 713.23 and (2)...
TENDERING UNDISPUTED SUMS TO CUT OFF ACCRUAL OF INTEREST
Posted on 17 October, 2015
A FORUM SELECTION PROVISION IN A SUBCONTRACT CAN BENEFIT A MILLER ACT PAYMENT BOND SURETY
Posted on 10 October, 2015
The recent opinion in U.S. ex rel. Galvin Bros., Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland, 2015 WL 5793346 (E.D.N.Y. 2015) illustrates when a forum selection provision in a subcontract can benefit a Miller Act payment bond surety.
Post navigation
About The Author
David Adelstein
Phone: (954) 361-4720
Email: Dadelstein@gmail.com
Pages
- About Me (David Adelstein)
- Bid Protests (Florida bid protests and Federal bid protests)
- Construction & Design Defects (and Florida Statutes Chapter 558)
- Construction Contracts
- Construction Liens
- Construction Safety, Workers Compensation Insurance, and Premise Liability Claims
- Delays, Acceleration, and Inefficiency (Lost Productivity)
- Insurance and Performance Bonds
- Payment Bonds Including Miller Act
Recent Posts
- QUICK NOTE: TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE PROVISIONS GIVE A PARTY BROAD DISCRETION TO END A CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP
- QUICK NOTE: JUST BECAUSE A DISCRETIONARY CONTRACTUAL PROVISION DOESN’T GO YOUR WAY DOESN’T MEAN THE OTHER PARTY BREACHED THEIR IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING
- PROVING THE ELEMENTS OF A CONSTRUCTIVE ACCELERATION CLAIM REQUIRES PROOF THAT THERE WAS AN EXCUSABLE DELAY