
Let me
Represent YOUR
Construction
Interests!
Analyzing legal issues that
impact parties across the
construction industry.
Recent Posts
IS A MILLER ACT PAYMENT BOND SURETY BOUND BY A DEFAULT OR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST ITS PRINCIPAL?
Posted on 2 January, 2021
Maguire-O’Hara Construction, Inc. v. Cool Roofing Systems, Inc., 2020 WL 6532852 (W.D. Oklahoma 2020) is an interesting case dealing with suretyship law and the subject of whether a Miller Act payment bond surety is bound by a default or default judgment against its prime contractor (bond principal).
In this case, a...
GENERALLY, WHAT CONSTITUTES A TRADE SECRET IS A QUESTION OF FACT
Posted on 25 December, 2020
In construction, contractors maintain competitiveness by compiling, combining, utilizing, or developing proprietary and unique systems. The systems can be from a cost standpoint (determining general conditions or general requirement costs and percentages including percentages for insurance) or can be with respect to certain construction assembly or delegated design...
QUICK NOTE: DISCRETION IN DETERMINING PREVAILING PARTY FOR PURPOSES OF ATTORNEY’S FEES
Posted on 20 December, 2020
In prior articles I have discussed that courts apply the significant issues test to determine the prevailing party for purposes of being entitled to attorney’s fees. A party that recovers an affirmative judgement is NOT the de facto prevailing party for purposes of an entitlement to...
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE: EQUITABLE REMEDY TO ENFORCE AFFIRMATIVE OBLIGATION
Posted on 19 December, 2020
When a party breaches an agreement, particularly when dealing with real estate, there is an equitable remedy known as specific performance that requests the trial judge issue an order to affirmatively force the breaching party to perform, i.e., close on the real estate contract. You are asking the court to...
BURDEN SUPPORTING TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT
Posted on 12 December, 2020
Terminating a contractor for default is a “‘drastic sanction’ and ‘should be imposed (or sustained) only for good grounds and on solid evidence.’” Cherokee General Corp. v. U.S., 150 Fed.Cl. 270, 278 (Fed.Cl. 2020) (citation omitted). This is true with any termination for default because terminating a contract...
About The Author
David Adelstein
Phone: (954) 361-4720
Email: Dadelstein@gmail.com
Pages
- About Me (David Adelstein)
- Bid Protests (Florida bid protests and Federal bid protests)
- Construction & Design Defects (and Florida Statutes Chapter 558)
- Construction Contracts
- Construction Liens
- Construction Safety, Workers Compensation Insurance, and Premise Liability Claims
- Delays, Acceleration, and Inefficiency (Lost Productivity)
- Insurance and Performance Bonds
- Payment Bonds Including Miller Act